Stage 1: Low Maturity (Task-Based Thinking)
Characteristics:
Design as decoration: Design is viewed as an isolated task, often reactive to other teams' requests.
Minimal user/business impact: Design decisions are rarely tied to business goals or user outcomes.
No systems thinking: Design is done in silos, focusing only on surface-level elements (e.g., "make this button blue").
Execution-focused: Little attention to the user experience or long-term effects of design choices.
Typical Questions:
"Can you make this look better?"
"Where should this button go?"
Examples:
Designers are brought in late in the development process.
Lack of user research or testing, with little input from stakeholders outside design.
Challenges:
Difficulty aligning with product vision or business objectives.
Design is often considered an afterthought, leading to rework.
Recommendations for Progression:
Introduce basic UX research practices to involve users early.
Start collaborating cross-functionally to understand the bigger picture.
Develop design documentation to capture decisions and rationale.
Stage 2: Medium Low Maturity (Feature-Based Thinking)
Characteristics:
Holistic task thinking: Tasks are grouped into larger feature-level deliverables, considering how components fit together.
Functional focus: Design is now about answering "What do we need to build?" but lacks strategic depth.
Beginning to consider user flows: Some thought is given to how users interact with features as a whole.
Limited feedback loops: Feedback from users or business stakeholders is not consistently applied.
Typical Questions:
"How should this feature work across devices?"
"What user flows should we design for this feature?"
Examples:
Design teams are involved in planning at the feature level, but without deep engagement in overall product strategy.
Some collaboration with product management and engineering, though design is still somewhat reactive.
Challenges:
Risk of building features that don’t meet actual user needs or business objectives.
Design remains output-focused rather than outcome-focused.
Recommendations for Progression:
Introduce goals and success metrics for features (e.g., user engagement, task success rates).
Start conducting usability tests to validate designs before development.
Improve collaboration between design and product teams.
Stage 3: Medium High Maturity (Goal-Based Thinking)
Characteristics:
Goal-driven design: Design decisions are aligned with specific user and business goals (e.g., user retention, conversion rates).
Systems thinking: Designers think about how their work impacts the entire user journey and the product ecosystem.
Data-informed decisions: Design is influenced by metrics and research (quantitative and qualitative).
Strategic alignment: Design works in sync with product and business strategy.
Typical Questions:
"What are the unmet user needs we should prioritize?"
"How can we grow this product to increase engagement?"
Examples:
Regular user research and data-driven insights are incorporated into design decisions.
Designers are key stakeholders in cross-functional teams, helping to shape product roadmaps.
Challenges:
Keeping up with rapid changes in user needs and business goals.
Ensuring all team members are aligned on goals and strategies.
Recommendations for Progression:
Develop a design strategy that includes KPIs and ties to business objectives.
Implement a robust feedback loop with data from A/B testing, user interviews, and analytics.
Foster a culture of experimentation to test and validate design decisions.
Stage 4: High Maturity (Behavior Change & Habit Formation)
Characteristics:
User behavior focus: Design is centered on understanding and influencing user psychology and behavior.
Data-driven iteration: High-velocity hypothesis testing and experimentation drive design decisions.
Habit formation: Design aims to create long-term user habits and engagement, often through behavioral insights and principles.
Significant business impact: Design is a key driver of business success, with direct influence on key metrics like customer lifetime value (CLV), acquisition, and retention.
Typical Questions:
"How can we change user behavior to drive better outcomes?"
"What are the psychological triggers that can improve engagement?"
Examples:
Designers collaborate with behavioral scientists, data scientists, and product teams to shape product strategies.
High emphasis on A/B testing, rapid iteration, and learning from data to continuously optimize design.
Challenges:
Balancing short-term experimentation with long-term vision and consistency.
Avoiding over-reliance on data without considering qualitative insights.
Recommendations for Sustaining High Maturity:
Continue investing in cross-disciplinary collaboration (e.g., psychology, data science).
Maintain a robust design system to ensure consistency while scaling experimentation.
Build an experimentation culture, where insights from tests are shared and applied across the organization.
Progression and Development
To move from one stage to the next, it’s critical to:
Improve Cross-functional Collaboration: Encourage designers to work closely with product managers, engineers, marketers, and data analysts at each stage.
Develop Skillsets: At each level, designers need to expand their capabilities—from basic UX/UI skills in Stage 1 to behavioral psychology and data analytics in Stage 4.
Embed Research and Feedback Loops: As the team matures, build in mechanisms for user research, feedback, and iterative testing.
Define Metrics and Success Criteria: Shift the focus from outputs (tasks and features) to outcomes (user behavior, business metrics) as the team matures.
© 2024 Caleb Chesnut